USA: 20 dollars 1861, km93 versus km74.1, normal versus paquet reverse

N#60637

Comments?

Why do we need 2 graphics for the same thing?  I think the other graphic is sufficient. 

Mint mark and no mint mark!

Sjoelund

Mint mark and no mint mark!

Not what I was asking.  Having one for 1861 and one for 1861S is the correct thing to do.  I'm asking why there are two for 1861 and two for 1861S.

Here are the 2 1861's:

Simply because you asked for them for both KM#. They are not covered by a generic km#, so it sounded a sound decision to me, since the users will come in from two different entries, so I agreed and then produced the graphics correspondingly 😊

Yes, I understand that.  My question is why there is different information on the km93 one than there is on the km74.1 one?  Seems to me the differences should be the same regardless of which direction one looks?  This is readily apparent on the 1861S graphics.  Why only discuss the size of the mint mark on the km93 graphic? The same size difference exists for the km74.1 graphic but is not mentioned?

rsirian1

Yes, I understand that.  My question is why there is different information on the km93 one than there is on the km74.1 one?  Seems to me the differences should be the same regardless of which direction one looks?

Which 1861S do you prefer? The 1861 are the same, I seem to remember.

Sorry, I missed this reply yesterday.  I prefer these:

If you want to highlight the difference is S mintmark size, add arrows to them.  The stars and the letter size are the real design changes, the S mintmark is secondary. 

Those two are for the km74.1 entry, so they dont change and here are the same for the km93 entry….

I don't see any differences, only that you don't want to use the following two?

Am I right, I don't want to delete them, before being sure?

That's right.  km74.1 will have one graphic for 1861 and one graphic for 1861S, km93 will have one graphic for 1861 and one graphic for 1861S.

Coin page and yeas line changes for km74.1/kmA74.1

And the km93 changes:

OK, for both of them, going out for dinner now.