USA: 1 cent 1804, km22, original versus “restrike” from 1860

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces16940.html



Please fell free to comment on this, thank you very much

Change "Unofficial strike" to "Unofficial restrike" 2 places
Change "most distinctive one are" to "most distinctive one is"

The coin page has "Many of the coins from that year were struck with broken corners." Does anybody know what that means? How does a round coin have corners?

引用する: "rsirian1"​Change "Unofficial strike" to "Unofficial restrike" 2 places
​Change "most distinctive one are" to "most distinctive one is"
​
​The coin page has "Many of the coins from that year were struck with broken corners." Does anybody know what that means? How does a round coin have corners?

​

Heh, heh, round corners on a round coin? Yes, Sir, probably the corner is the rim, the place on any coin, where the reverse and obverse joins the 3rd side, the edge. Comprendes?

OK.

Yes. I understand. Maybe not a good place to put that information (on the year line). Red Book has pictures of broken dies 1804 coins. Add that comment to the graphic instead? PCGS has nice pictures.



Edit: Actually I just noticed the coin in the graphic has a broken die error. You could point that out with an arrow and a comment.

Did I understand you correctly?

No. The official strikes had the broken dies not the restrike.



With a comment such as, "Many of the 1804 coins were struck with broken dies."

Yes. Perfect.