Duplicate page [解決]

This page https://en.numista.com/catalogue/exonumia436946.html is a duplicate, and should be deleted.

The tokens on this page were NOT issued as part of a Dutch set, but as part of a set from the Netherlands Antilles, and they are already listed on this page: N#323039

Members should be moved to that page.

The alignment matches the alignment of the coins from the Netherlands Antilles, NOT the alignment of the Dutchs coins from this era. 

In 1996 and 1997, the Dutch mint sets came with a different set token, with the coat of arms of one of the Dutch provinces, like this one: N#333022

Legend is not the same in the 2 links

You're right! I'll check the catalogue, and my own collection.

After checking both:

All Dutch mint set tokens (alignment: 90 degrees) from 1983 until 1986 bear the text “ 's RIJKS MUNT”;

All Dutch mint set tokens (alignment: 90 degrees) from 1987 until 1998 bear the coat of arms of one of the 12 provinces of the Netherlands: tombac or bicolor for BU sets; silver or cupronickel for Proof sets;

All NA mint set tokens (alignment: 180 degrees) from 1983 until 1994 bear the text: “ 's RIJKS MUNT”;

The 1986 Aruban mint set token  (alignment: 180 degrees) bears the text: " 's RIJKS MUNT”.

All NA mint set tokens (alignment: 180 degrees) from 1995 until 1997 bear the text: “DE NEDERLANDSE MUNT”.

So for each year and country within the Kingdom only ONE type was produced (apart from minting errors).

This is a complicated series, made worse by a printing errror in the Postma catalogue: two pages are swapped in the middle of the listing.

The tokens are now listed on two pages, but the descriptions and images differ. There are two options to fix it:

1. On the page, add the missing year, and move it to from the Netherlands to the Netherlands Antilles section. On  the existing NA page, delete the three tokens and move all members;

or:

2. Modifiy the existing NA page and include the image with the different text in the comments.

I don't know which option you prefer, but either way it will fix the problem.

The new page is a duplicate of another, previously made, page. See my more recent post. I think the best way is to delete it, and keep the older one, since it is complete, has more (correct) information, and better quality pictures.

Members should be moved, as I suggested in my previous post.

Now that the duplicate page has been deleted, following changes can be made:

On N#323039  the following years should be deleted: 1995, 1996, 1997.

Members should be moved to the corresponding items on N#108620 

Reason: in 1995, the legend has changed from “ 's RIJKS MUNT ” to “ DE NEDERLANDSE MUNT ”.

Done